THE PARADOX OF THE RICH: ARE THERE TOO MANY INSECT SPECIES IN ECUADOR, OR TOO FEW SCIENTISTS TO STUDY THEM?

Contenido principal del artículo

Adrián Troya

Resumen

Ecuador, despite being one of the most biodiverse nations on Earth, illustrates a paradox: extraordinary insect richness coexists with a critical shortage of taxonomists to study it. Globally, about one million insect species have been described, while estimates suggest five to ten million may exist, particularly in tropical regions. In Ecuador, only a handful of insect groups—such as butterflies, dung beetles, ants, and orchid bees—have been moderately documented. However, the majority of insect orders remain virtually unexplored. Millions of specimens preserved in national and international collections await identification, yet a lack of funding, infrastructure, and trained specialists has stalled progress.


This situation reflects the “Linnean shortfall,” or taxonomic gap, which hampers conservation efforts by leaving species unnamed and therefore unprotected; many of these species are potentially at risk of extinction. Ecuadorian taxonomic research output has grown slowly, from a few publications in the late 1990s to an average of eight per year in recent years. Still, it remains far behind regional leaders, such as Brazil. The challenges include scarce financial resources, minimal government support, the undervaluation of taxonomy within universities, and declining interest among young scientists, who are increasingly turning to disciplines with faster economic rewards.


To reverse this trend, the text emphasizes the importance of inspiring new generations of entomologists, enhancing access to collections, and securing stable research positions. Taxonomy, though often underappreciated, underpins ecology, evolution, and conservation by linking species names to their ecological roles. Without renewed investment and commitment, Ecuador risks losing its insect wealth—perhaps less than 1% of which is currently described—before it can be studied or conserved.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
1.
Troya A. THE PARADOX OF THE RICH: ARE THERE TOO MANY INSECT SPECIES IN ECUADOR, OR TOO FEW SCIENTISTS TO STUDY THEM? . EEC [Internet]. 29 de diciembre de 2025 [citado 17 de enero de 2026];10(2):6. Disponible en: https://revistaecuadorescalidad.agrocalidad.gob.ec/revistaecuadorescalidad/index.php/revista/article/view/258
Sección
Artículos de Opinión
Biografía del autor/a

Adrián Troya, Escuela Politécnica Nacional

Adrian Troya earned a degree in Biological Sciences from Universidad Central del Ecuador and a master’s degree in Ecology and Evolution from the University of Munich, Germany. He completed his PhD in Biological Sciences, specializing in entomology, taxonomy, and systematics, at Universidade Federal do Paraná in Curitiba, Brazil. Adrian focuses on the classification and discovery of new species, with a particular interest in understanding the evolution of tropical insects. By using ants as model organisms and employing molecular phylogenetics, he aims to explore how geological and environmental processes, including human-induced changes, shape their distribution and drive their morphological and genetic change over time. He is currently appointed as a research entomologist in the Department of Biology at Escuela Politécnica Nacional University, where he oversees the collection of insects and other invertebrates at the institution.

Citas

[1] von Linné C. Critica botanica. Leiden: Conrad Wishoff; 1737.
[2] Coke E. Institutes of the Lawes of England“Coke on Littleton.” OUP Oxford; 1628.
[3] Schuh RT. The Linnaean system and its 250-year persistence. In: Botanical Review. 2003.
[4] Laurin M. The Subjective Nature of Linnaean Categories and Their Impact on Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity Studies. Contributions to Zoology. 2010; 79(4).
[5] Linnaeus C. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera, & species. L. Salmii, Holmiae. 1758. p. 824.
[6] Benton TG, Bieg C, Harwatt H, Pudasaini R, Wellesley L. Food system impacts on biodiversity loss. Chatham House. 2021.
[7] Ritchie H. OurWorldinData.org. 2022. How many species are there? Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/how-manyspecies-are-there
[8] May R. How many species? Philosophical Transactions - Royal Society of London, B. 1990; 330(293–304).
[9] Caley MJ, Fisher R, Mengersen K. Global species richness estimates have not converged. Vol. 29, Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2014.
[10] Stork NE, McBroom J, Gely C, Hamilton AJ. New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(24).
[11] Antonelli A. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Neotropical Organisms: New Insights into an Old Riddle. University of Gothenburg; 2008.
[12] De‐Silva DL, Elias M, Willmott K, Mallet J, Day JJ. Diversification of clearwing butterflies with the rise of the Andes. J Biogeogr. 2016;43(1):44–58.
[13] Favila ME, Noriega JA, da Silva PG, Korasaki V. Editorial: Neotropical dung beetle diversity: ecological, historical, and anthropogenic perspectives. Vol. 11, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2023.
[14] Stork NE. How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth? Vol. 63, Annual Review of Entomology. 2018.
[15] Chamorro W, Marin-Armijos D, Asenjo A, Vaz-De-Mello FZ. Scarabaeinae dung beetles from Ecuador: A catalog, nomenclatural acts, and distribution records. Zookeys.
2019; 2019(826):1–343.
[16] Pazmiño-Palomino A, Troya A. Ants of Ecuador : new species records for a megadiverse country in South America. Rev Bras Entomol. 2022; 66(2):1–15.
[17] Padrón PS, Roubik DW, Picón RP. A Preliminary Checklist of the Orchid Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) of Ecuador. Vol. 2018, Psyche (London). 2018.
[18] Hall JP. Collaborative Research: The Butterflies of Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)-A Comprehensive Survey of a Megadiverse Fauna. Vol. 6, NSF Award Number 0639977. Directorate for Biological Sciences. USA; 2007.
[19] Wilson EO. Biodiversity research requires more boots on the ground: Comment. Vol. 1, Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017.
[20] Raposo MA, Kirwan GM, Lourenço ACC, Sobral G, Bockmann FA, Stopiglia R. On the notions of taxonomic ‘impediment,’ ‘gap,’ ‘inflation,’ and ‘anarchy,’ and their effects
on the field of conservation. Syst Biodivers. 2021; 19(3).
[21] Brown JH, Lomolino MV. Biogeography. Sunderland, Massachusetts (Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers); 1998. 691 p.
[22] Wagner DL. Insect declines in the Anthropocene. Vol. 65, Annual Review of Entomology. 2020.
[23] Padial JM, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M. The integrative future of taxonomy. Vol. 7, Frontiers in Zoology. 2010.
[24] Bass MS, Finer M, Jenkins CN, Kreft H, Cisneros-Heredia DF, McCracken SF, et al. Global conservation significance of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park. PLoS One [Internet]. 2010 Jan [cited 2011 Aug 18]; 5(1):e8767. Available from: http://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.
[25] Engel MS, Ceríaco LMP, Daniel GM, Dellapé PM, Löbl I, Marinov M, et al. The taxonomic impediment: A shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches. Vol. 193,
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2021.
[26] Rice, R. Who Speaks for Nature? Indigenous Movements, Public Opinion, and the Petro- State in Ecuador. By Todd A. Eisenstadt and Karleen Jones West. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. 288p. $78.00 cloth. - Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivism in Ecuador. By Thea Riofrancos. Durham: Duke University Press, 2020. 264p. $99.95 (cloth), $26.95 (paper). Perspectives on Politics. 2021; 19(3).
[27] Hardin, G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science (1979) [Internet]. 1968; 162(5364):1243–8. Available from: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9563937
[28] Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG. Agricultural Expansion and Its Impacts on Tropical Nature. Vol. 29, Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2014.
[29] Wheeler QD. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. 2004 ;( March):571–83
[30] Woinarski JCZ, Braby MF, Gibb H, Harvey MS, Legge SM, Marsh JR, et al. This is the way the world ends; not with a bang but a whimper: Estimating the number and ongoing rate of extinctions of Australian non-marine invertebrates. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction. 2024; 2:e23.
[31] Dallwitz M. A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon. 1980; 29(1):41–6.
[32]Brown B V. Automating the “Material examined” section of taxonomic papers to speed up species descriptions. Zootaxa. 2013; 3683(3):297–9.